Back to Top

Heroes Rise, twelfth entry: Wild Parties

Welcome, brave adventurers…

… to the twelfth entry into the Heroes Rise chronicle. This episode was recorded on Saturday, 17th February 2018, and made available for download on Wednesday, 21st February 2018 at heroesrisepodcast.com

In this week’s Adventurer’s Pack, Lennon gives us a tool for making pornog– I mean, maps. Next, we take a look at some D&D News as we cover:

  • D&D Beyond’s videos on Halflings and Dwarves
  • The latest Unearthed Arcana on going where no one has gone before
  • And we answer a frustrated DM’s letter about metagaming

After that we take a Short Rest with our Adventurer’s Journals for some tips on party composition; before finishing off the show by looking into the Scrying Pool to see what you have to say.

Timings
  • Intro: 00:00
  • Adventurer’s Pack: 1:38
  • News: 9:00
    • D&D Beyond: 9:00
    • Unearthed Arcana: 12:34
    • Listener Letters: Metagaming: 20:03
  • Short Rest: 35:16
  • Scrying Pool: 43:20
    • Community Question: 50:04
  • Outro: 50:29
Links
A Short Rest: Party Composition

mThis Week’s Community Questions
Do you have any advice for our Frustrated DM on discouraging player knowledge and metagaming?
And do you ever take your players into the wild? Do you believe that raw exploration can be an engaging part of a campaign?
What’s your take on Random encounters: entertaining diversions or annoying breaks in the adventure?

m

Heroes Rise are always on the lookout for new team members that have a passion for Dungeons and Dragons. Please know that all of our positions are volunteer, but we do offer a well known outlet for your work. If you have a particular skill that you believe could enhance our content, then send your contact information and experience to sendingstone@heroesrisepodcast.com

You can also follow us on the social media sites! We’re on Facebook! Head over to facebook.com/heroesrisednd and say “hi”, or check us out on Twitter via @heroesrisednd for details of our show times and other fun stuff.

Liked this episode? Totally hated it? Leave a comment below, or contact us using our handy web form.

A special thanks to Vindsvept for making the awesome music you hear throughout the show, be sure to check him out at vindsvept.bandcamp.com; and a special thanks to the designer of our banners and avatars, Lo of Lo’s Lair — you can find him on Twitter @RealLarryD and on Facebook at facebook.com/LosLair

2 Comments

  • Marty
    February 21, 2018 at 6:15 pm

    Party “balance” be damned! There. I said it. Moving on…

    Great answers for Frustrated DM re: metagaming. I’ve been fortunate that my players have mostly checked themselves in that regard and are more focused on roleplaying their own characters than unwisely trying to outwit me at the table. As Ostron mentioned, some of the struggles sound like the growing pains of a new DM and all of the other advice was well-said and should be easy to incorporate into Frustrated DM’s approach.

    Neither of my campaigns has gone off-road yet, but I like the look of the Into The Wild UA as some fun prompts for my players with the Outlander background.

    And I’ve yet to find an occasion for a truly “random” encounter. I spend a fair bit of time linking everything into the overall story. If there are bandits on the road to spice travelling up, are they technically “random”? I’ve yet to actually have my players in a “dungeon” per se… and even then, I’ll want the monstrous ecosystem to make sense. I guess I like maintaining that internal logic for an ongoing campaign…with everything except economics – there’s a rabbit hole worth sidestepping. I digress. Randomness seems to fit one-shot-style crawls better, to my way of thinking.

  • Gath Memvar
    February 21, 2018 at 6:23 pm

    Regarding metagaming:
    First, what a good discussion! I know as I’ve played the game, I’ve swung back and forth on how strict (or indifferent) I am towards metagaming. In general, I allow a decent amount of metagaming, though it’s more because most of my players are focused on problem solving and not power gaming. In my experience, at least SOME meta is required, especially in harder published campaigns, if you want to have a remote chance of surviving. Example: Very early in the Strahd campaign, there is a creature that is pretty powerful for very low level characters. If you know what the creature is, you know to run. If you don’t and try to fight, you immediately get walloped, at which point it’s already too late to retreat. Those of you that have played Curse of Strahd know this creature well, as it caused a great deal of saltiness when our group encountered it. It’s a bit of a ‘gotcha’ that does a good job setting the tone for the campaign, but is tremendously frustrating if you don’t know what it is.
    Should you fully restrict metagaming, you can potentially force players to march their characters to their deaths, which can be heavily demoralizing if you have a Knight-style of player who is attached to their character; on the other hand, should you not care at all, that one power gamer can ruin the experience for everyone else. In short, it takes both mature players and DMs to work together to maximize the fun. If players and DMs are fighting each other, something’s gone wrong.